Skip to main content
31% average lift in collectionsfor practices that switch to MBS
MBS Medical Billing Services
Diagnostic Radiology·Published September 2026

Turning payer policy lag into a 97.2% clean claim rate

A 24-location diagnostic radiology group in Michigan was waiting on commercial payers to catch up with new procedures and CPT codes. MBS moved control to the front end, escalated directly with payers, and built evidence-based clinical appeals.

Clean claim rate
97.2%

Above HFMA's 95% benchmark

A/R days reduction
52%
Revenue collected
$725.8K → $5.23M

2023 to 2025

Time to core framework
90–120 days

Specialty

Diagnostic Radiology

Practice size

~9.5K patients served a year

Locations

24 locations across Michigan

Payer mix

50% commercial, 40% Medicare, 10% Medicaid

Client tenure with MBS

3.5 years

Engagement objective

What the client needed

  • Strengthen the revenue cycle by reducing payer-related delays.
  • Improve claim processing for newly introduced procedures and codes.

Starting position

The challenges

  • Commercial payer policy lag delayed reimbursement for new radiology procedures.
  • Medical necessity denials increased because commercial payer policies were outdated.
  • Higher A/R days caused by manual documentation and paper-based appeals.
  • Electronic claim processing failed for newly introduced CPT codes.

Solutions

What MBS put in place

1

Front-end control

  • Zero-day credentialing and enrollment.
  • Automated prior authorization and eligibility verification.
  • Dual-component (26/TC) coding optimization.
  • AI and automation for pre-submission claim validation.
2

Payer escalation and appeals

  • Direct payer escalation for delayed claims.
  • Evidence-based clinical appeal management replacing paper-based appeals.
  • End-to-end revenue cycle optimization across the 24 locations.
3

Reporting, tools, and training

  • Front-end operational dashboards, plus coding and profitability analytics.
  • Denial and payer performance reporting alongside A/R and financial health dashboards.
  • Multi-payer direct deposits, digital patient intake, and patient-pay portals.
  • Staff training delivered across the front-end and billing teams.

Impact

What changed

  • A clean claim rate averaging 97.2%, above HFMA's 95% industry benchmark.
  • A 52% reduction in A/R days.
  • Revenue collected grew from $725,802 in 2023 to $5,227,079 in 2025, with $3,709,238 collected in the first half of 2026.
  • Increased physician referrals, a better patient financial experience, and reduced administrative burden.

Recovery

Annual revenue collection

2023 to mid-2026

2023 to mid-2026
PeriodRevenue collected
2023$725,802
2024$3,213,895
2025$5,227,079
2026 (Jan–Jun)$3,709,238

Time to first results

The core framework was implemented within 90 to 120 days, with staff training running alongside it.

Why it worked

The operating model behind the result

  • Strategic alignment on front-end control.
  • A proactive rather than reactive regulatory stance.
  • Specialized expertise in radiology coding realities, including dual-component billing.
  • A shared commitment to patient-centric financial workflows.
  • Data-driven transparency and accountability.

Want the same review of your own A/R and denials?

We will look at your aging, denial reasons, and first-pass rate and tell you what is recoverable. A 30-minute call. No obligation, no long sales pitch.

How does your A/R and denial rate compare?

Free benchmark tool — enter six numbers, see your bands against published industry sources, and download a branded PDF.

Run the benchmark